[rules-users] Backward chaining, again...

Michael Anstis michael.anstis at gmail.com
Tue Aug 2 03:21:45 EDT 2011


Hi,

AFAIK derivation queries are the only way to achieve backwards chaining.

Furthermore, your suspicion is correct: Guvnor does not support BC at
present however we obviously plan to provide for it.

With kind regards,

Mike

On 2 August 2011 05:19, johnysums <johnysums at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> My previous post didnt get the attention i was hoping for, so i decided to
> ask once more. Are derivation queries the only way to use backward
> chaining?
> If so, then it is (at least for now) impossible to implement backward
> chaining rules in guvnor, correct?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Backward-chaining-again-tp3217917p3217917.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110802/fae11db1/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list