[rules-users] Lock-on-active and ruleflow-group
bitter
rgorzkow at gmail.com
Wed Aug 10 15:01:28 EDT 2011
Thank-you
09-08-2011 13:23 użytkownik "Wolfgang Laun-2 [via Drools]" <
ml-node+3238607-487429483-420566 at n3.nabble.com> napisał:
>
>
> Modules (=agenda-group and ruleflow-group) are fine for large-scale
> rule flow control. First choice for fine-grained rule execution
> control is - Logic.
>
> Write your constraints so that only one rule fires, e.g., by testing
> price == null.
>
> Ideally, you should also avoid salience by fully describing the cases
> for prices 1 and 2.
>
> Using flow control and salience - this isn't rule based programming
> any more, just a very elaborate way of implementing sequential logic.
>
> -W
>
>
>
> On 9 August 2011 13:08, bitter <rgorzkow at gmail.com> wrote:
>> But when I use activation-group only one fact has price. I would like to
>> insert two facts (or more) and only one rule invoke per fact.Like in my
test
>> class.
>> Could you look at use case that I attached in my first post? Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Wolfgang Laun-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> You should use activation-group "price" or similar, not lock-on-active.
>>> -W
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9 August 2011 11:40, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Whenever a ruleflow-group becomes active [...], any rule within that
>>>> group that has lock-on-active set to true will not be activated any
>>>> more." (Emphasis added by me.)
>>>>
>>>> Do you activate the ruleflow-group before you insert the Car fact?
>>>>
>>>> -W
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9 August 2011 11:05, bitter <rgorzkow at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Log:
>>>>>
>>>>> ==>[BeforeActivationFiredEvent: getActivation()=[Activation
rule=Second
>>>>> rule, act#=1, salience=25, tuple=[fact
>>>>> 0:1:1428842218:1428842218:1:DEFAULT:Car{color='red', size='small',
>>>>> price=null}]
>>>>> ],
>>>>>
getKnowledgeRuntime()=org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl at 72f6f1b6]
>>>>> ==>[AfterActivationFiredEvent: getActivation()=[Activation rule=Second
>>>>> rule,
>>>>> act#=1, salience=25, tuple=[fact
>>>>> 0:1:1428842218:1428842218:2:DEFAULT:Car{color='red', size='small',
>>>>> price=2}]
>>>>> ],
>>>>>
getKnowledgeRuntime()=org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl at 72f6f1b6]
>>>>> ==>[BeforeActivationFiredEvent: getActivation()=[Activation
rule=First
>>>>> rule, act#=0, salience=20, tuple=[fact
>>>>> 0:1:1428842218:1428842218:2:DEFAULT:Car{color='red', size='small',
>>>>> price=2}]
>>>>> ],
>>>>>
getKnowledgeRuntime()=org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl at 72f6f1b6]
>>>>> ==>[AfterActivationFiredEvent: getActivation()=[Activation rule=First
>>>>> rule,
>>>>> act#=0, salience=20, tuple=[fact
>>>>> 0:1:1428842218:1428842218:3:DEFAULT:Car{color='red', size='small',
>>>>> price=1}]
>>>>> ],
>>>>>
getKnowledgeRuntime()=org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl at 72f6f1b6]
>>>>> ==>[BeforeActivationFiredEvent: getActivation()=[Activation
rule=Second
>>>>> step, act#=2, salience=40, tuple=[fact
>>>>> 0:1:1428842218:1428842218:3:DEFAULT:Car{color='red', size='small',
>>>>> price=1}]
>>>>> ],
>>>>>
getKnowledgeRuntime()=org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl at 72f6f1b6]
>>>>> ==>[AfterActivationFiredEvent: getActivation()=[Activation rule=Second
>>>>> step,
>>>>> act#=2, salience=40, tuple=[fact
>>>>> 0:1:1428842218:1428842218:3:DEFAULT:Car{color='red', size='small',
>>>>> price=1}]
>>>>> ],
>>>>>
getKnowledgeRuntime()=org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl at 72f6f1b6]
>>>>> Car{color='red', size='small', price=1}
>>>>>
>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError:
>>>>> Expected :2
>>>>> Actual :1
>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:645)
>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:145)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
CarKnowledgeBaseTest.shouldObtainPriceWhereSalienceIsBigger(CarKnowledgeBaseTest.java:47)
>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:76)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
>>>>> at
>>>>> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
>>>>> at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:157)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:71)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:199)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:62)
>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>> at
>>>>>
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>>>> at
>>>>> com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:120)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Lock-on-active-and-ruleflow-group-tp3237089p3238338.html
>>>>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-users mailing list
>>>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Lock-on-active-and-ruleflow-group-tp3237089p3238587.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
>
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Lock-on-active-and-ruleflow-group-tp3237089p3238607.html
>
> To unsubscribe from Lock-on-active and ruleflow-group, visit
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3237089&code=cmdvcnprb3dAZ21haWwuY29tfDMyMzcwODl8OTM4MzkzMzcw
--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Lock-on-active-and-ruleflow-group-tp3237089p3243602.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110810/f8e09b74/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list