[rules-users] Guided Rule Editor doesn't list no-setter-fields if a fact is annotated

[Mark Proctor]

Sorry I misread what you said. I thought you said that beans are only 
usable in the IDE if it has both a getter and a setter - my misundestanding.

M
On 19/12/2011 16:19, Michael Anstis wrote:
> I'm not clear on what you are saying.
>
> We reflect the methods of existing beans:-
>
>   * If the member has a getter it is available in the LHS
>   * If the member has a setter it is available in the RHS
>   * If the member has a getter and a setter it is available in both
>     the LHS and RHS
>
> Members of declared types are available in both the LHS and RHS (as we 
> implicitly create getters and setters).
>
> I don't understand "we should only support getters" but "be 
> intelligent enough not to allow the setter to be used in the IDE". If 
> we only support getters there is no setter; and if there is no setter 
> how do we allow the user to set the value? Of course my comments are 
> from a Guvnor perspective, if you mean to change the way declared 
> types work, then... well, we'll have to change Guvnor anyway :)
>
> 2011/12/19 Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org 
> <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>>
>
>     On 19/12/2011 16:04, Michael Anstis wrote:
>>     You are not mistaken.
>>
>>     For POJO models we use reflection (class.getMethods) to determine
>>     whether a Type's methods members are available in the LHS or RHS
>>     or both, according to Java Bean conventions. Declarative models
>>     have their members available in both the LHS and RHS by default
>>     as we generate "getters" and "setters" for them.
>     It probably looks like we should support only getters though, for
>     existing beans. We just need to be intelligent enough not to allow
>     the setter to be used in the IDE.
>
>     Toshiya: Sounds like a great introduction task, you up for the
>     challenge?
>
>     Mark
>
>>
>>     On 19 December 2011 05:47, Toshiya Kobayashi <tkobayas at redhat.com
>>     <mailto:tkobayas at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hello,
>>
>>         In Guvnor 5.3.0, I can use CEP feature support in Guided Rule
>>         Editor after uploading a class by "Upload POJO Model jar" and
>>         annotating it in "New Declarable Mode".
>>
>>         1.      |       declare TestPojo
>>         2.      |           @role(value = event)
>>         3.      |       end
>>
>>         But if some fields of the POJO class have only getter
>>         methods, Guided Rule Editor won't list those fields in
>>         "Modify constraints" popup. (if a field has a setter method,
>>         it will be listed)
>>
>>         public class TestPojo {
>>                private String name;
>>                public TestPojo() {}
>>                public String getName() { return name; }
>>         //      public void setName(String name) { this.name
>>         <http://this.name> = name; }
>>         }
>>
>>         Am I missing something? If it's not an expected behaviour, I
>>         will raise a JIRA.
>>
>>         Cheers,
>>         Toshiya
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         rules-users mailing list
>>         rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     rules-users mailing list
>>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org  <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-users mailing list
>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20111219/b5df8a90/attachment.html