[rules-users] Clearing an AgendaGroup

[Wolfgang Laun]

After reading this description, I don't see any reason for using auto-focus
in the rule you have presented in the original email; especially the
combination with setFocus() in the RHS looks rather kinky to me.

Do you really mean that the final state after group2 is expected to be
"*in*consistent"
w.r.t. the checks in group1?

Anyway, I would use a rule in MAIN to give the focus to group1 and then to
group2 and avoid auto-focus and any "control logic" in the rules of either
group.

-W


On 26 January 2011 20:47, Evert Penninckx <evert.penninckx at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> manstis wrote:
> >
> > Were the rules in Agenda Group "group1" executed, or merely evaluated?
> >
> > Agenda Group controls which activations on the agenda are executed, rules
> > in
> > all Agenda Groups will continue to be evaluated.
> >
>
> I figured as much. But they're still being fired.
>
> I haven't had the chance to test this on a simple case. My ruleset has for
> now about 5 to 10 rules in group1 and about 15 in group2. Group1 evaluates
> the initial state of the working memory and signals possible
> inconsistencies
> (inserted as message facts in drool). The second group modifies facts in
> the
> working memory. The final state is expected to be inconsistent in regard to
> the consistency checks on the initial state. Yet, I see warnings being
> entered in drools after group2 modified facts....
>
> I could consider a rule flow, but the checks are only there to debug
> abnormal behaviour and not related to a business process or something.  I'd
> really want to keep it hidden from the java-code calling the drools rules.
>
>
>
> Grtz
>
> E.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Clearing-an-AgendaGroup-tp2353014p2356753.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110127/de08c3ce/attachment.html