[rules-users] maven-drools-plugin, anyone?

[Geoffrey De Smet]

Op 10-03-11 09:27, Ansgar Konermann schreef:
> Hi Geoffrey,
>
> On 10.03.2011 08:58, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
>> There's a jira for a maven-drools-plugin with possible requirements
>>     and I believe there already 2 implementations in the wild.
>>
>> IMHO:
>> 1) It should be centralized into the droolsjbpm-tools repository.
>> Make a pull request on that repository and I 'll peer review it.
>>
> It's ASL licensed - if you feel like it, fork it, pull it, do whatever
> you like under this license. My team and I needed a starting point and
> we found it too complicated to work with the drools source code
> repository during the last few months/weeks.
Understandable.
The big changes are done, so
the drools source code repository should be stable any day now :)
Watch the lights on hudson:
   https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/Drools%20jBPM/
>> 2) The goals etc should follow maven naming conventions.
>> 3) There should be integration tests.
>> 4) It should use the latest maven 3 best practices.
>>
>> In short: it's best to start from a really good, existing, up-to-date,
>> ASL-licensed other maven plugin that does non-java compiling.
>>
> Is this just a write-down of your thoughts with no relation to the
> implementation described on the given web page, or should it actually
> referr to the given implementation?
Just a quick write down of my thoughts,
I haven't had the change to check your implementation yet.
Sorry for the confusion.

Afaik, from maven 2 to maven 3, a lot of the plugin infrastructure has 
been deprecated and replaced
by new API's (aether, it testing, ...), so I was wondering if the plugin 
takes advantage of those things (if appropriate).

> If it should be the latter, could you be a bit more concrete (except for
> maybe point 1)? Admitted, I'm new to maven plugin development, but I
> tried hard and thus can't see where points 2 to 4 are violated. If there
> are any points to be improved, I'd be glad to fix them, given some
> pointers to relevant information and a ticket in the bug tracker (also
> linked from the web page).
>
> Best regards
>
> Ansgar
>> Op 09-03-11 22:42, Mauricio Salatino schreef:
>>
>>> I will take a look on that right now..
>>> I was planning to do the same for some of my example projects.
>>> I will come back with some feedback!
>>> Greetings.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ansgar Konermann
>>> <ansgar.konermann at googlemail.com
>>> <mailto:ansgar.konermann at googlemail.com>>   wrote:
>>>
>>>       Hi,
>>>
>>>       I prepared a tiny drools compiler plugin for Maven 3. It currently
>>>       contains the smallest feature-set which is potentially useful for my
>>>       colleagues at work, so up to now it's no more than a starting
>>>       point for
>>>       my team. Nevertheless, I invite you to take a look at it, comment
>>>       on it
>>>       and suggest features _you_ would like to see in the plugin in one
>>>       of its
>>>       future releases.
>>>
>>>       There's some inital documentation here:
>>>       http://passion.forco.de/content/maven-drools-plugin
>>>
>>>       Looking forward to your comments.
>>>
>>>       Best regards
>>>
>>>       Ansgar
>>>       _______________________________________________
>>>       rules-users mailing list
>>>       rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>>       https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>    - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
>>>    - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
>>>    - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
>>>
>>>    - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>

-- 
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet