[rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

Edson Tirelli ed.tirelli at gmail.com
Thu Mar 17 13:00:25 EDT 2011


   Greg,

   I will look into that. Trunk is under heavy work right now, so it will
probably not work.

   Edson

2011/3/17 Greg Barton <greg_barton at yahoo.com>

> Yes, but I just fired up a small project using it and it used 100% of CPU.
>  If you build the attached project you'll see the tests run just fine. (They
> use fireAllRules.)  If you launch from the commandline, ("java -jar
> target/DroolsBoxes-1.0.jar") which uses fireUntilHalt, the rules fire (and
> complete) just fine, but it continues to use 100% of a cpu core
> indefinitely.  This is with 5.1.1.  If I change the drools version to
> 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT it compiles but the tests won't run.  They all fail with the
> following exception:
>
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> org.drools.spi.DeclarationScopeResolver.<init>([Ljava/util/Map;Ljava/util/Stack;)V
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuildContext.<init>(RuleBuildContext.java:72)
> at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:1198)
> at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:629)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java:278)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder.java:451)
> at
> org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:28)
> at com.sample.DroolsTest.readKnowledgeBase(DroolsTest.java:75)
> at com.sample.DroolsTest.go(DroolsTest.java:31)
> at com.sample.BoxTest.test0(BoxTest.java:21)
>
> --- On *Thu, 3/17/11, Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Edson Tirelli <ed.tirelli at gmail.com>
>
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires
> To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 10:47 AM
>
>
>
>    To be honest, I believe so, but didn't profiled it extensively. I used
> fireUntilHalt() in my Webinar yesterday on a live demo and it worked nicely.
>
>    Edson
>
> 2011/3/17 Greg Barton <greg_barton at yahoo.com<http://mc/compose?to=greg_barton@yahoo.com>
> >
>
>
> Has the performance problem with fireUntilHalt been fixed in 5.2?
>
> --- On *Thu, 3/17/11, Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça <
> Vitor.Mendonca at brisa.pt <http://mc/compose?to=Vitor.Mendonca@brisa.pt>>*wrote:
>
>
> From: Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça <Vitor.Mendonca at brisa.pt<http://mc/compose?to=Vitor.Mendonca@brisa.pt>
> >
>
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires
> To: "'Rules Users List'" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org<http://mc/compose?to=rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> >
> Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 7:01 AM
>
>
>  Hi Thomas, thanks for the info!
>
>
>
> I googled it quite a bit and I think it’s a path to be explored, albeit
> I’ve saw several messages on the mailing list regarding performance issues
> when using fireUntilHalt.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<http://mc/compose?to=rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
>
> --
>   Edson Tirelli
>   JBoss Drools Core Development
>   JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<http://mc/compose?to=rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


-- 
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20110317/62f9e023/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list