[rules-users] Using accumulate function-Performace Issues

[Wolfgang Laun]

Your posts use several terms others aren't familiar with. It's
difficult to imagine the data model behind this rule snippet, and
that's why you don't receive any answers.

-W


On 10/04/2012, sanal <sanal.p at icthealth.com> wrote:
> Hi ,
>          I have used the modify function. It works, but its time
> consuming.Since the fact gets  modified at RHS ,the rule engine reprocess
> the same.But the time taken for execution is more.
>
> If any body have better idea please help.
>
> Regards
> Sanal.P
>
>
>
> /*#From row number: 21*/
> rule "Package Rate_21"
> 	salience 65515
> 	when
> 		$objOrderedComponents:AccumulatedComponent()
> 		$packageDefinition:PackageDefinition($packageId:packageId)
> 		$orderedComponent:OrderedComponent($id1:componentKey,$qty:componentQty)
> from $objOrderedComponents.getOrderedComponentList() and
> 		$accumulatedQty:Number()
>     	from accumulate (
> $accQtyComponent:OrderedComponent(packageChargeRecordId==$packageId, $AccQty
> : componentQty) from
> $objOrderedComponents.getOrderedComponentList(),sum($AccQty ) )  and
> 		$pkgComps:PackageComponent(componentKey==$id1,(quantityLmt
>>=($qty+$accumulatedQty.intValue()))) from
> $packageDefinition.getPackageComponentList()	
> 	then
>  		$orderedComponent.setIsComponentApplicable(true);
>         $orderedComponent.setPackageChargeRecordId($packageId);
>         modify ($objOrderedComponents){};
> end
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Using-accumulate-function-tp3896078p3899398.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>