[rules-users] Using GUVNOR for FUSION RULES
Michael Anstis
michael.anstis at gmail.com
Fri Apr 27 07:25:14 EDT 2012
And the screenshot ;)
On 27 April 2012 12:24, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:
> What version of Guvnor are you using?
>
> I attach a screenshot produced using 5.4.0.CR1.
>
> I also note your screenshot shows "All ACObeservation" where as mine
> "There is a TelephoneCall"
>
> Can you describe the steps you have taken, or supply a repository export?
>
> On 27 April 2012 12:12, Pellecchia Carolina <c.pellecchia at vitrociset.it>wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I couldn't bind a field because the click on the field doesn't work.
>> concretely, please see attached.
>>
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>> Carolina Pellecchia
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com<mailto:
>> michael.anstis at gmail.com>>
>> Date: Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM
>> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Using GUVNOR for FUSION RULES
>> To: Rules Users List <rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>>
>>
>> Glad to be of assistance.
>>
>> To bind a field, once the field has been added to the Fact type simply
>> click on the field name.
>>
>> With kind regards,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On 27 April 2012 08:31, Pellecchia Carolina <c.pellecchia at vitrociset.it
>> <mailto:c.pellecchia at vitrociset.it>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I’m a colleague of Matteo Cusmai, we would like to thank you for your
>> suggestions. you have been very helpful.
>>
>> Following your steps, I couldn't understand a point: how can I bind a
>> field(for ex. RadiationObservation.location) to a variable?
>> specifically,
>>
>> $obs : RadiationObservation(?$obsLocation : location? ) over
>> window:length (1) from entry-point "lowLevelSensorStream"
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Carolina Pellecchia
>> ________________________________________
>> Da: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org> [rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org>] per conto di
>> rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org> [rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org>]
>> Inviato: giovedì 26 aprile 2012 19.07
>> A: rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> Oggetto: rules-users Digest, Vol 65, Issue 93
>>
>> Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org>
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> rules-users-owner at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users-owner at lists.jboss.org>
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Setting variables in a stateless session (Welsh, Armand)
>> 2. Re: Using GUVNOR for FUSION RULES (Michael Anstis)
>> 3. Re: Guvnor guided editor and non argument constructor
>> (Michael Anstis)
>> 4. looking for advice (Bobby Richards)
>> 5. Re: Guvnor guided editor and non argument constructor
>> (Vincent LEGENDRE)
>> 6. Re: Guvnor guided editor and non argument constructor (Sean Su)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:57:11 +0000
>> From: "Welsh, Armand" <AWelsh at StateStreet.com>
>> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Setting variables in a stateless session
>> To: "rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>" <
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>> Message-ID:
>> <
>> D52DE19B4C463C4BA21F81790B9F079543084863 at GDCPW3376.corp.statestr.com
>> <mailto:
>> D52DE19B4C463C4BA21F81790B9F079543084863 at GDCPW3376.corp.statestr.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Think of a stateless knowledge session as being a statefull knowledge
>> session, with the following adjustments:
>> A stateless knowledge session cannot be manipulated prior the start of
>> the session.
>> A stateless knowledge session cannot be manipulated or queried after the
>> end of the session.
>> A stateless session begins when you execute the fireallrules method.
>> A stateless session ends when the rule processing terminates. -- There
>> is no pause, there is no restarting. The instant the rules stop firing,
>> and return to your calling code, the knowledge session has been torn down.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org> [mailto:
>> rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org>] On Behalf Of bardelman
>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 2:06 AM
>> To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> Subject: [rules-users] Setting variables in a stateless session
>>
>> hi folks, this is a simple question ,
>> i just want to understand how is it possible that a stateless session
>> have a
>> setGlobal() method as it does not maintain a state. What's the point ?!
>> i also have some confusion between a "request scope" and a "stateless
>> session scope" i think it s the same..
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Setting-variables-in-a-stateless-session-tp3940652p3940652.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:52:09 +0100
>> From: Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com<mailto:
>> michael.anstis at gmail.com>>
>> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Using GUVNOR for FUSION RULES
>> To: Rules Users List <rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAAG9P0tN=HqTJ9hkJHDiQGBk=_10o4f810-bQBhbTFwUtO-fEQ at mail.gmail.com
>> <mailto:10o4f810-bQBhbTFwUtO-fEQ at mail.gmail.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>> - Create "New Rule"
>>
>>
>> - Add a condition (green + near "WHEN")
>>
>>
>> - Select "From Entry Point"
>>
>>
>> - Type "lowLevelSensorStream" into TextBox
>>
>>
>> - Click on "click to add patterns..."
>>
>>
>> - Select your Fact Type (see * below)
>>
>>
>> - In "Over sliding window" ListBox select "Length"
>>
>>
>> - Type "1" into the TextBox next to "Length".
>>
>> * OK, so this is possibly where you're having problems.
>>
>> In order for a Fact Type to be used with CEP it needs to be annotated as
>> an
>> Event. This is how this can be accomplished:-
>>
>> *If you have a Declarative Model
>> *
>>
>> - Open the Declarative Model
>>
>>
>> - Select the Fact Type that should be an Event
>>
>>
>> - Add an Annotation, name="role", key="value", value="event"
>>
>>
>> - Save
>>
>>
>> *If you have a POJO Model*
>>
>> - Create a new Declarative Model
>>
>>
>> - Add a Fact Type that matches the name of that in your JAR
>>
>>
>> - Add an Annotation, name="role", key="value", value="event"
>>
>>
>> - Save
>>
>>
>> Annotating your POJO is covered in the Drools Expert User Guide. You are
>> just using Guvnor to achieve what is required.
>>
>> With kind regards,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On 26 April 2012 15:22, Matteo Cusmai <cusmaimatteo at gmail.com<mailto:
>> cusmaimatteo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Mike,
>> > thanks for suggestion, but i have already read documentation.
>> >
>> > First of all, i cannot define "over window:length(1) from entry-point
>> > lowLevelSensorStream".
>> > Do you help me to do this?
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Matteo.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Michael Anstis <
>> michael.anstis at gmail.com<mailto:michael.anstis at gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yes this is possible with Guvnor 5.2 onwards.
>> >>
>> >> The user-guide explains how to use the Guided Rule Editor (but not
>> >> specifically CEP features).
>> >>
>> >> Read that and give it a try - it's reasonably intuitive (not an excuse
>> >> for poor documentation though) and come back here with questions.
>> >>
>> >> With kind regards,
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >> On 26 April 2012 09:08, Matteo Cusmai <cusmaimatteo at gmail.com<mailto:
>> cusmaimatteo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>> i am novice on GUVNOR, but i would like to define my fusion rules by
>> >>> graphical tool.
>> >>>
>> >>> An example of my rules is:
>> >>>
>> >>> rule "radiation-event"
>> >>> salience 10
>> >>> no-loop
>> >>> when
>> >>> $obs : RadiationObservation( $obsLocation : location,
>> value >
>> >>> 10 ) over window:length(1) from entry-point lowLevelSensorStream
>> >>> not RadiationEvent( this meets[ 25s ] $obs, location
>> >>> geoIsWithinDistance[ 5m ] $obsLocation )
>> >>> then
>> >>> insert(new RadiationEvent( $obs, "Radiation over 10",
>> >>> Event.THREAT_HIGH, $obsLocation, $obs.getSensor() ));
>> >>> end
>> >>>
>> >>> rule "radiation-update"
>> >>> salience 5
>> >>> no-loop
>> >>> when
>> >>> $obs : RadiationObservation( $obsLocation : location,
>> value >
>> >>> 10 ) over window:length(1) from entry-point lowLevelSensorStream
>> >>> $event : RadiationEvent( this meets[ 25s ] $obs, location
>> >>> geoIsWithinDistance[ 5m ] $obsLocation )
>> >>> then
>> >>> Event e = Event.clone($event);
>> >>> e.addObservation($obs);
>> >>> insert( e );
>> >>> retract($event);
>> >>> retract($obs);
>> >>> end
>> >>>
>> >>> Is it possibile to define rules such the above using GUVNOR?
>> >>> Are there some documentation or tutorial?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks a lot in advance,
>> >>> Matteo Cusmai.
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> rules-users mailing list
>> >>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> rules-users mailing list
>> >> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120426/31ab515e/attachment-0001.html
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:40:27 +0100
>> From: Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com<mailto:
>> michael.anstis at gmail.com>>
>> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor guided editor and non argument
>> constructor
>> To: Rules Users List <rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAAG9P0tnkU2nLzXduz03si26uL-wFtRAA=0ogGAF05OJEZ4dGw at mail.gmail.com
>> <mailto:0ogGAF05OJEZ4dGw at mail.gmail.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Seems reasonable enough.
>>
>> On 26 April 2012 14:36, Sean Su <sean.x.su at gmail.com<mailto:
>> sean.x.su at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> > It seems that the new fact created by the guided editor must be from
>> > the java class that has the default non argument constructor in
>> > Guvnor. There seems no way we can customize it to pass arguments in.
>> > This would force us to provide setters to the object.
>> >
>> > Is this a true statement?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Sean
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPad
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120426/75a0a7a7/attachment-0001.html
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:42:41 -0500
>> From: Bobby Richards <bobby.richards at gmail.com<mailto:
>> bobby.richards at gmail.com>>
>> Subject: [rules-users] looking for advice
>> To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAAqkdrv7Nv1WMByZsd+XM=OZvetnEOFk03x7QaTGyNc6wAbccQ at mail.gmail.com
>> <mailto:OZvetnEOFk03x7QaTGyNc6wAbccQ at mail.gmail.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> I have not yet determined how I want to implement my problem and was
>> hoping
>> to get some feedback.
>>
>> I am using drools to migrate the logic from my automated currency trading
>> infrastructure. Each currency pair, i.e. eurusd has around
>> 200 attributes associated with it.
>>
>> This includes range values (high, low, average) for multiple time periods,
>> volatility information, bid/ask updates etc.
>>
>> Currently I have classes associated for each, so say for range:
>>
>> class Range {
>> double high;
>> double low;
>> double avg;
>> }
>>
>> Range europe = new Range(); //european trading hours
>> Range us = new Range(); //us trading hours
>>
>>
>> Questions:
>> 1. I am wondering if I should not just create a map that lists every
>> attribute per pair as a key ("eurusd:range:europe:high")? So essentially
>> my drools session will have one fact, not counting the incoming quotes. I
>> see on the list that this was a problem before the mvel updates but that
>> was a while ago.
>>
>> 2. When an incoming quote might modify a value, what is the performance
>> difference between using a rule to change the value or making the changes
>> outside of the ksession and referencing the facthandler to modify? Is one
>> method considered 'cleaner'?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bobby
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120426/2b86c5f5/attachment-0001.html
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:48:37 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Vincent LEGENDRE <vincent.legendre at eurodecision.com<mailto:
>> vincent.legendre at eurodecision.com>>
>> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor guided editor and non argument
>> constructor
>> To: Rules Users List <rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>> Message-ID:
>> <1c470056-3677-4bd2-a1eb-368610b51999 at confiance.eurodecision.fr
>> <mailto:1c470056-3677-4bd2-a1eb-368610b51999 at confiance.eurodecision.fr>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> JavaBeans convention : all default constructible and plenty of setters
>> (for writeable properties) and getters (for readeable properties)
>>
>> ----- Mail original -----
>>
>> De: "Michael Anstis" <michael.anstis at gmail.com<mailto:
>> michael.anstis at gmail.com>>
>> ?: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>> Envoy?: Jeudi 26 Avril 2012 15:40:27
>> Objet: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor guided editor and non argument constructor
>>
>>
>> Seems reasonable enough.
>>
>>
>> On 26 April 2012 14:36, Sean Su < sean.x.su at gmail.com<mailto:
>> sean.x.su at gmail.com> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> It seems that the new fact created by the guided editor must be from
>> the java class that has the default non argument constructor in
>> Guvnor. There seems no way we can customize it to pass arguments in.
>> This would force us to provide setters to the object.
>>
>> Is this a true statement?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Sean
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120426/29fa9844/attachment-0001.html
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:06:57 -0400
>> From: Sean Su <sean.x.su at gmail.com<mailto:sean.x.su at gmail.com>>
>> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor guided editor and non argument
>> constructor
>> To: Rules Users List <rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>> Message-ID: <-6645870489207221519 at unknownmsgid>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> What I am prototyping is part of the event processing (with or without
>> fusion). I want to use the rules created by the Guvnor to create the new
>> events. However, as you would understand, once the event has been created,
>> it should not be modified as it happened in the past.
>>
>> So I am trying to avoid setters if possible.
>>
>> Sean
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Apr 26, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Vincent LEGENDRE <
>> vincent.legendre at eurodecision.com<mailto:
>> vincent.legendre at eurodecision.com>> wrote:
>>
>> JavaBeans convention : all default constructible and plenty of setters
>> (for
>> writeable properties) and getters (for readeable properties)
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *De: *"Michael Anstis" <michael.anstis at gmail.com<mailto:
>> michael.anstis at gmail.com>>
>> *?: *"Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org>>
>> *Envoy?: *Jeudi 26 Avril 2012 15:40:27
>> *Objet: *Re: [rules-users] Guvnor guided editor and non argument
>> constructor
>>
>> Seems reasonable enough.
>>
>> On 26 April 2012 14:36, Sean Su <sean.x.su at gmail.com<mailto:
>> sean.x.su at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> > It seems that the new fact created by the guided editor must be from
>> > the java class that has the default non argument constructor in
>> > Guvnor. There seems no way we can customize it to pass arguments in.
>> > This would force us to provide setters to the object.
>> >
>> > Is this a true statement?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Sean
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPad
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120426/26a2bdaa/attachment.html
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>> End of rules-users Digest, Vol 65, Issue 93
>> *******************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120427/385ee05d/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10402 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120427/385ee05d/attachment-0001.png
More information about the rules-users
mailing list