[rules-users] Drools 5.3 partitioned rule base

Mauricio Salatino salaboy at gmail.com
Fri Mar 2 11:15:51 EST 2012


But are the facts related with each other? do you need to analyze them all
together inside the same session?
Can you share a little bit more about your use cases? What do you mean with
"Execution" execution of what? What do you mean with "evaluation"?

Cheers

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:12 PM, gboro54 <gboro54 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Executions need to happen in an order based on a data and a message id(at
> least at one part of the evaluation). Because of this my plan was to use
> dynamic salience and insert as many of the facts as I can at a time
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-3-partitioned-rule-base-tp3793558p3793941.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
 - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org
 - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar

 - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120302/b3dec589/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list