[rules-users] [Drools Planner] Hard constraint appears to be ignored - How to isolate a working memory corruption in drools expert

[Wolfgang Laun]

Works also with 5.4.0.Beta2.

Does this really fail in the context of Drools' unit tests?

-W


On 9 March 2012 12:23, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can't reproduce the described effect with 5.3.0.Final, will look at
> 5.4.0.Beta2 later today.
>
> As far as I can see, the test case asserts the correct result which
> Drools produces anyway?
>
> -W
>
> On 09/03/2012, ge0ffrey <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Great work Reinis!
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Drools-Planner-Hard-constraint-appears-to-be-ignored-tp3777209p3812319.html
> > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120309/218e5ce1/attachment.html