[rules-users] [Drools Planner] Hard constraint appears to be ignored - How to isolate a working memory corruption in drools expert

[Reinis]

This is unlucky!

I just tested with following branches, tags of drools-compiler (fetched from upstream about 10 Minutes ago):
- master
- 5.3.x
- 5.4.0.Beta2

In all cases I get this unittest result:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<-2>  but was:<-1>
	at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:50)
	at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:287)
	at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:67)
	at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:199)
	at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:205)
	at org.drools.integrationtests.MiscTest.testJBRULES3416(MiscTest.java:9558)<------ the line number can be different than in git, I don't know how to correctly apply my changes to different branches and thus am manually applying patches on each branch/tag I am testing
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:49)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)

This is my JRE:
java version "1.6.0_26"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode)

On 03/09/2012 02:21 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:

> Works also with 5.4.0.Beta2.
>
> Does this really fail in the context of Drools' unit tests?
>
> -W
>
>
> On 9 March 2012 12:23, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com 
> <mailto:wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Can't reproduce the described effect with 5.3.0.Final, will look at
>     5.4.0.Beta2 later today.
>
>     As far as I can see, the test case asserts the correct result which
>     Drools produces anyway?
>
>     -W
>
>     On 09/03/2012, ge0ffrey <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com
>     <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     > Great work Reinis!
>     >
>     > --
>     > View this message in context:
>     >
>     http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Drools-Planner-Hard-constraint-appears-to-be-ignored-tp3777209p3812319.html
>     > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > rules-users mailing list
>     > rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>     > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>     >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users