[rules-users] Even to check if all the rules have been fired

[Wolfgang Laun]

For each WS request, you should call fireAllRules(). Nothing is gained by
calling fireUntilHalt(). Of course, your rules may determine when to call
halt, in all possible circumstances. Then, and only then, it would be the
same thing. But using halt is more compulsive: you must not miss calling
halt().

-W


On 3 May 2012 16:50, sumatheja <sumatheja at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi wolfgang,
>                  Thanks for the response. I've thousands of facts(fetched
> from DB) which wont be changing very frequently. So I'm loading them to
> the  knowledgesession at the time of deploying the application and it stays
> live on the server. Whenever my application(a webservice) is called, I
> fetch this session(which is on the server jvm), add the new facts and
> validate them and retract the newly added facts so that my session will be
> intact(as it was before the webservice call). To achieve this I have used
> the fireUntilHalt. Correct me If I'm making a mistake here.
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> You don't say why you are using fireUntilHalt(). What you want to know,
>> i.e., that all rules due to the insertion of some facts have been fired, is
>> naturally provided by fireAllRules().
>>
>> You could come up with some hack to achieve your intent with
>> fireUntilHalt(), but why do it in a roundabout way?
>>
>> -W
>>
>>
>> On 3 May 2012 15:11, sumatheja <sumatheja at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>         I'm using a stateful knowledge session in my project, where *
>>> ksession.fireUntilHalt()* will trigger the rules as and when the facts
>>> are inserted. I,m developing a functionaly where I need to insert some new
>>> facts and and retract them once the valid rules have been fired. I'm unable
>>> to find the exact event listener to check if all the valid rules have been
>>> fired. Do I need to handle this case(is it implicitly handled)? *AfterActivationFiredEvent
>>> *seems to be activated after successfully firing each rule, so I feel
>>> this wont serve the purpose. Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> --
>>> cheers
>>> Sumatheja Dasararaju
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-users mailing list
>>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> cheers
> Sumatheja Dasararaju
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20120503/619bb6c2/attachment.html