[rules-users] Sending Java Objects Through Camel, received by Drools 6

[Mark Proctor]

At the moment it requires command wrapper objects, which map the object to the method. This allows batch interactions.

There was some work for more RPC type interactions, i.e. maps camel route only to “insert” and doesn’t need a command wrapper. But I don’t think that made 6.0.

If you know that all objects in the camel rout and just for insertion, you can add a camel transformer. The transforms the object into a wrapper command object, wrapping the original object
http://camel.apache.org/message-translator.html

Mark


On 12 Dec 2013, at 17:50, jordan.brown <jordan.brown at rackspace.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We're currently testing sending XML/JSON (including a message and drools
> commands) through Camel and Drools receiving it (using the documentation
> given--Part IV Drools Integration in the Doc), but we're curious if it's
> possible to just send a Java Object (e.g., Person Object) through Camel and
> have Drools pick it up--whereby the object will be received by drools and
> then the actual insert and firing of rules will occur on the other side
> (i.e., we wouldn't send the drools commands to Camel).
> 
> Out-of-the-box, is this possible? Anybody doing this? As of now, we're
> continuing the approach in the Drools documentation (Part IV Drools
> Integration).
> 
> -Jordan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Sending-Java-Objects-Through-Camel-received-by-Drools-6-tp4027256.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users