[rules-users] How to track constraint truth [was: Non short circuit ANDing]

[Lance]

Thanks for the gentle reply. My initial reply was made without having read
your latest example. The "experimental" syntax was what had me getting
anxious, as I already have to fend off the Java developers that want to
"just write the rules in Java" (i.e. they don't want to have to think in a
non-procedural manner).

As for the eval() of old, I thought that it was a discouraged practice to
use it; precisely because it was considered to be non-normative in its
approach. Again, it may have just been my interpretation of the
documentation that was out-of-line with the mainstream thinking here.



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-How-to-track-constraint-truth-was-Non-short-circuit-ANDing-tp4022021p4022046.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.