[rules-users] Evaluate rules for multiple facts of the same type within a StateuflSession

[Wolfgang Laun]

We've been through this kind of discussion time and again...

Check whether procedural programming isn't better suited for your task
whenever you shy away from the requirements and benefits of a rule
based solution.

And see the section on "Fact Classification" in my whitepaper:
https://engage.redhat.com/forms/rule-design-patterns

-W


On 13/02/2013, pdario <dario.piantanida at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry, it's not clear.
>
> Do you mean I have to add a condition in each rule to check whether other
> discount have been already applied?
> Even so, I can I control the preferred order of the discounts without
> salience? Do I have to put negated conditions of each rule??
>
> It looks cumbersome...
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Evaluate-rules-for-multiple-facts-of-the-same-type-within-a-StateuflSession-tp4022157p4022270.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>