[rules-users] What is the correct approach towards using Drools?

[Matteo Cusmai]

The facts should be immutable, so you should remove them and insert again
when they change.
If your facts change often, you have to consider to use fusion where your
facts will be events.
On 14 Feb 2013 04:29, "mohdejaz74" <mohdejaz74 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm working on a project which uses Drools as a component. It is connected
> to a web server. Every time a request arrives to web server, it in turn
> loads the facts and invokes fireAllRules. Facts do change over time but
> rules do not ... I'm bit concerned that this may not be correct of using
> Drools, since we are constantly doing setup /tear down.
>
> Keep facts in memory and updating them when necessary - that requires major
> change in the architecture of the application.
>
> I want to know - has anyone done something similar? Does it lead major
> problems in future? Performance Issues?
>
> Regards
> Ejaz
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/What-is-the-correct-approach-towards-using-Drools-tp4022291.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130214/dbdbe357/attachment-0001.html