[rules-users] JBoss Drools evaluation

[Wolfgang Laun]

It's "Rete", not "Reto". Being Rete-based is reportedly disappearing with
6.x.

I'm not sure what sort of criterion the "graphical representation" of rules
should represent. There is a way for displaying the Rete network resulting
from a rule, but it's not something over which a user like a "business
analyst" would get all excited.

Some backward chaining functionality is indeed available, although it
cannot be compared with what you have in, say, Prolog.

-W


On 8 July 2013 08:33, Fatma Zaheer <fmaqsoom at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Dear Rules users,
>
> Can anyone of you verify the information in the table mentioned below on
> JBoss Drools ( business rules management systems)?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>   Evaluation Criteria ****  JBoss Drools****   Software Platform****  Java
> ****   Facilitate for rules testing ****  Yes****   Level of language of
> rules****  High****   Type of target organization****  All****   Coding
> of rules required****  Yes****   Business analysts control business logic*
> ***  Yes****   Rules based web application****  Yes****   On Cloud****
> n.a.****   Forward/Backward chaining****  Forward chaining ****   Uses
> Reto-base or constraint base rules engine****  Reto-Base****   Graphical
> representation of rules****  Yes****
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20130708/460d4940/attachment.html