[rules-users] If I have a rule that has a lot of permutation, which is the best approach to set it up? (Currently using decision table)

[SSWA]

Attached is a sample rule decision table that I have set up.

As you can see, I have designed my conditions very nicely in the picture.
But if I were to add a new check, I will actually have to slowly key in the
values.

I'm wondering if there is any way that when I slot a condition into row 4,
it will auto populate the other fields that are "grouped" together. This
way, I wouldn't have to re-write those condition's information.

So example if I have a new module coming in for P1 called MODULE-A, and I
want to create a condition for it to say if the nationality is FR and
Eligibility is Y, it is 500 dollar. I will probably click the + button at
row 5 or even row 6. Then the fields, "P1", "Nationality", "Eligibility",
"Fee Code" will all be populated since they are grouped, and I will just key
in the Module Code.

Is there any way to do this?



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/If-I-have-a-rule-that-has-a-lot-of-permutation-which-is-the-best-approach-to-set-it-up-Currently-usi-tp4029207.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.