[rules-users] "in" syntax breaking the Rete Tree

[Wolfgang Laun]

On 21/02/2014, droolster <quant.coder at gmail.com> wrote:
> For developers
> who are new to Drools (like me), one of the assurances we get that our
> rules
> are properly defined is the Rete viewer. If the Rete Viewer shows errors,
> then it gives doubts about whether the rules are properly defined. In my

Are we talking about the same view, i.e., the canvas where garishly
coloured blobs are shown? I would not trust this, either way. There is
the parser, for syntax errors. As for logical errors, there are formal
methods (difficult) and tests (...).

> case, the rules still function correctly but if I am going take my rule
> engine into a Production environment I want all the assurances I can get.

True, but there are better ways indeed.

-W