[rules-users] Nested negation constraints behavior change from Drools 5.x to 6.x

[Davide Sottara]

We could reproduce the issue, it's now in a unit test:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/pull/317/files

Thanks for reporting this!!
Davide

On 02/28/2014 12:44 AM, mikerod wrote:
> I made a basic jar that only depends on Drools.
>
> All the rules do is output to standard out to demonstrate.
> This can just be ran with:
> `mvn exec:java -Dexec.mainClass="example.drools.TestingNestedNegation"`
>
> This is with v6.0.1.Final; so switching this in the pom.xml to 5.6.0.Final,
> for example, will cause the different behavior between the versions i.e.
> changing <drools.version>6.0.1.Final</drools.version> in pom.xml .
>
> @Mark I looked at the link and he had a zip file.  I'm guessing a jar with a
> main class in it is sufficient? drools-example-tests-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> <http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4028398/drools-example-tests-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar>  
>
> Also, I am still using the now, legacy API for the kb and Stateful session. 
> I tried to add the logback.xml config file, but it doesn't seem to work
> quite so simply there.  That is likely due to me not reading up on the new
> API yet...  I'm hoping the initial uplift to v6.x can just be to the legacy
> API and migrate over later on.
>
> I don't think the API choice would make this behavioral change in the rules
> nonetheless.
>
> Let me know what else would be helpful.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Nested-negation-constraints-behavior-change-from-Drools-5-x-to-6-x-tp4028390p4028398.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>