[rules-users] Fusion, Insert Events with timestamp in the past.

[SebastianStehle]

I see that the update process is not optimal, but can you tell me if my
simple example should work or not?

We get measurements from sensors. Because of network delay and other
intermediate processes the timestamp of the measurements can be some seconds
behind the time of the insert. In this case the rules with after would not
work correctly as well. 

I am new to drools, so there is a high chance that I make some mistakes.



--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Fusion-Insert-Events-with-timestamp-in-the-past-tp4029843p4029847.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.