[seam-dev] Name of generic type for persistence context

[Emmanuel Bernard]

It's like in mathematics, you conventionally use x,y for variables and  
n, i for integers in all fields.

On  Jun 2, 2008, at 17:21, Dan Allen wrote:

> One of the comments from a reviewer of Seam in Action with regard to
> org.jboss.seam.framework.PersistenceController et al
>
> If you know why they chose to use "T" instead of, say, PM or P, that
> would be good to say. "T" doesn't really make a lot of sense unless
> they were talking about a "Transacton" manager … but this is a
> persistence thing, right? Why not use "P"?
>
> Is this worth a JIRA or explanation? Personally, I always interpreted
> as being short for "type".
>
> -Dan
>
> -- 
> Dan Allen
> Software consultant | Author of Seam in Action
>
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>
> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
> basis, life and work come first and, at times, keep me away from my  
> mail
> for a while. If you contact me, then don't hear back for more than a  
> week,
> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
> caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a  
> message if
> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev