[seam-dev] Re: renaming source directories in a seam-gen project
Emmanuel Bernard
emmanuel at hibernate.org
Sun Sep 28 09:47:57 EDT 2008
Btw the goal was to get rid of this distinction as soon as a solution
is found (need some work on JBoss as). The diff is more an annoyance
than anything else
On Sep 28, 2008, at 9:41, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org>
wrote:
> Does moving solidified classes make a real performance difference?
> My main concern is that model classes and their dependencies can
> never be hot deployed, so moving to a main / hot scheme will create
> a whole new set of confusion
>
> On Sep 28, 2008, at 6:11, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm happy with src/main and src/hot
>>
>> On 28 Sep 2008, at 09:57, Dan Allen wrote:
>>
>>> Btw, we will still retain the concept of action and model
>>> components.
>>> That much does make sense. So no UI changes to JBossTools would be
>>> necessary.
>>>
>>> -Dan
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I would like to propose that we modify the name of the source
>>>> directories in a seam-gen project so they better reflect how they
>>>> are
>>>> built rather than what classes they might contain. The current
>>>> paths
>>>> are:
>>>>
>>>> src/action
>>>> src/model
>>>>
>>>> The src/action directory works as the hot deployable classpath when
>>>> running in development mode. In production mode, they both get
>>>> dumped
>>>> into the same classpath. Here is the renaming I am proposing:
>>>>
>>>> src/action -> src/hot
>>>> src/model -> src/main (or src/static)
>>>>
>>>> I am *not* looking for a major change here. This is just a small
>>>> task
>>>> that I feel would just cause less confusion. For instance, I often
>>>> recommend to clients to move classes that have "solidified" out
>>>> of the
>>>> hot deployment directory so that they are not constantly reloaded
>>>> (hence wasting build time). But currently it feels unnatural to
>>>> put an
>>>> action component under src/model.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to know if these names are okay and if, perhaps, you
>>>> have
>>>> a better choice for "src/main". I really don't expect objections to
>>>> "src/hot", but you have a chance to speak up.
>>>>
>>>> -Dan
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dan Allen
>>>> Software consultant | Author of Seam in Action
>>>>
>>>> http://mojavelinux.com
>>>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a
>>>> daily
>>>> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
>>>> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more
>>>> than a week,
>>>> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message
>>>> was
>>>> caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a
>>>> message if
>>>> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dan Allen
>>> Software consultant | Author of Seam in Action
>>>
>>> http://mojavelinux.com
>>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>>
>>> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a
>>> daily
>>> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
>>> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more
>>> than a week,
>>> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message
>>> was
>>> caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a
>>> message if
>>> you feel that it did not reach my attention.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
More information about the seam-dev
mailing list