[seam-dev] Seam 2.1 branch

[Pete Muir]

On 20 Apr 2009, at 22:42, Dan Allen wrote:

>
>
> I really see this as a module. It's no different than our current  
> spring (and now guice) integration in that sense. We could have an  
> "ioc" common module and then have modules that build on that. But in  
> general it is IoC (or really DI) related.
>
> IOC was a bad name for that module originally, lets not repeat that  
> mistake.
>
> What about DI, or is that too general? I guess the first question to  
> answer is what is the nature of these integrations. The JBoss AS  
> team has probably thought about this terminology so we should see  
> what they have to say about the name. Obviously, each integration  
> would be named after the framework, but if there were shared code  
> what would it be called? Not a question we have to answer right away.

Huh? What has DI/IOC got to do with it? These modules don't provide  
DI, they provide integrations with other frameworks. Anyway, this  
stuff belongs in Web Beans, not Seam.

--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete