[seam-dev] Seam 2.1 branch

[Pete Muir]

On 20 Apr 2009, at 22:48, Pete Muir wrote:

>
> On 20 Apr 2009, at 22:42, Dan Allen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I really see this as a module. It's no different than our current  
>> spring (and now guice) integration in that sense. We could have an  
>> "ioc" common module and then have modules that build on that. But  
>> in general it is IoC (or really DI) related.

Actually, it's totally different. We will initially build a bridge  
(like the spring/guice stuff), but what Shane is talking about is the  
"emulation layer" for Seam legacy code that allows you to run Seam2  
code natively on Seam3.

>>
>>
>> IOC was a bad name for that module originally, lets not repeat that  
>> mistake.
>>
>> What about DI, or is that too general? I guess the first question  
>> to answer is what is the nature of these integrations. The JBoss AS  
>> team has probably thought about this terminology so we should see  
>> what they have to say about the name. Obviously, each integration  
>> would be named after the framework, but if there were shared code  
>> what would it be called? Not a question we have to answer right away.
>
> Huh? What has DI/IOC got to do with it? These modules don't provide  
> DI, they provide integrations with other frameworks. Anyway, this  
> stuff belongs in Web Beans, not Seam.
>
> --
> Pete Muir
> http://www.seamframework.org
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete