[seam-dev] Seam 2.1 branch

[Dan Allen]

>
> Should we qualify the term modules? Meaning instead of modules and sandbox
> we have something like
>
> modules
> sandbox-modules
> thirdparty-modules
>
> Modules (I'm open to a qualifier like official-modules) would be official
> modules in Seam...stuff that is going into EAP. sandbox would be modules we
> want to put into core, but they just aren't ready yet or may never be.
> thirdparty would be modules we are hosting for a community member but we
> don't want to maintain. For instance, perhaps the host the tapastry
> integration module or whatever. I'd be interested in doing that with
> examples too.
>
> examples
> sandbox-examples
> thirdparty-examples
>
> Thoughts? This should be easy to add without affecting what you have setup
> already.


Any thoughts on this yet?

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan

NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters.  Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20090421/245fcd37/attachment.html