[seam-dev] laying the tracks for Seam 3

[Pete Muir]

On 21 Apr 2009, at 22:17, Jay Balunas wrote:

>> faces (which would have page actions, faces messages, and perhaps  
>> engulf the current ui too)
>
> Sounds good. We should impl page actions on top of JSF2 events I  
> think. FacesMessages aren't needed as they are now stored in the  
> flashscope by default.
>
> Pete - We had talked about having the ui component being separate  
> from seam core and not depend on it.  This would allow application  
> to who are not using seam to take advantage of the ui component.   
> This came up a while back in a discussion about the RichFaces  
> validation components and moving them to seam-ui.
>
> Would this current approach satisfy that?

Yes. As I keep saying "there is no Seam core" in Seam 3 - all modules  
will *just* depend on any JSR-299 impl :-) But you are actually asking  
"Can the faces module degrade gracefully such that what can be used in  
a plain JSF2 environment - no 299 - works" I think?


--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete