[seam-dev] laying the tracks for Seam 3

[Jay Balunas]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On 21 Apr 2009, at 22:17, Jay Balunas wrote:
>
>  faces (which would have page actions, faces messages, and perhaps engulf
>>> the current ui too)
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good. We should impl page actions on top of JSF2 events I think.
>> FacesMessages aren't needed as they are now stored in the flashscope by
>> default.
>>
>> Pete - We had talked about having the ui component being separate from
>> seam core and not depend on it.  This would allow application to who are not
>> using seam to take advantage of the ui component.  This came up a while back
>> in a discussion about the RichFaces validation components and moving them to
>> seam-ui.
>>
>> Would this current approach satisfy that?
>>
>
> Yes. As I keep saying "there is no Seam core" in Seam 3 - all modules will
> *just* depend on any JSR-299 impl :-) But you are actually asking "Can the
> faces module degrade gracefully such that what can be used in a plain JSF2
> environment - no 299 - works" I think?


I misspoke regarding seam-core :-(

I really mean depending on any other seam classes in other modules (
including 299).  If we are going to migrate some RichFaces components to
seam-ui.  I just want to make sure we don't end up requiring users to
include X # of seam modules, and/or 299.

iirc - I think we were discussing some of the bean validation code.  We
should discuss other components as well.


>
>
>
> --
> Pete Muir
> http://www.seamframework.org
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>
>


-- 
blog: http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20090421/a6757a0d/attachment.html