[seam-dev] Modules have been moved

[Mark Struberg]

git per se has no security at all. Git uses the security of the underlying transfer/storage layers.

Btw: you should rethink your modules/modularity because git treats a repo always as a whole. Means no spatial checkouts, a tag is always over the whole repo, etc.

There is a mechanism called git submodule [1] but that is a bit clumsy still. 

Git is _really_ fine, but certainly needs a bit of a different mindset than SVN!

LieGrue,
strub

[1] http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git-core/docs/git-submodule.html

--- Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> schrieb am Mo, 14.12.2009:

> Von: Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com>
> Betreff: Re: [seam-dev] Modules have been moved
> An: "Pete Muir" <pmuir at redhat.com>
> CC: seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Datum: Montag, 14. Dezember 2009, 23:24
> On 15/12/09 04:59, Pete Muir wrote:
> > I was waiting to see if there was a chance jboss.org
> would provide Git soon. There isn't.
> >
> > We can therefore do the migration to github.
> >
> > Only outstanding issue is connecting commits into JIRA
> - is this something people use a lot?
> >    
> 
> It seems that github has commit postbacks which we can
> possibly use to 
> connect issues together.  The other thing I'm not
> clear about is 
> repository security - it was our intention to give module
> committers 
> access to their own module (and nothing else).  I
> can't see anything on 
> github that gives us the fine grained security control that
> SVN 
> currently does.  Of course maybe I just don't know
> enough about git yet 
> and security works in a totally different way...
> > On 11 Dec 2009, at 17:04, Dan Allen wrote:
> >
> >    
> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Shane
> Bryzak<sbryzak at redhat.com> 
> wrote:
> >> The plan is to probably move to github, although
> we are going to do some (prudent) evaluation first.
> >>
> >> We'll of course wait for Pete to return on Monday
> because we can't decide anything without him, and likely he
> makes the final call anyway. But I still vote that we just
> go for it. We have gotten tons of feedback about github and
> while there have been great arguments for Mercurial, I think
> we can all agree that both are better than SVN and github is
> well run. If worse comes to worse, we can make another move,
> but all signs just point to doing it.
> >>
> >> So let's hang until Monday, see what Pete says,
> but if need be, we can do a vote on the list and just bite
> the bullet.
> >>
> >> -Dan
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Dan Allen
> >> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam
> in Action
> >> Registered Linux User #231597
> >>
> >> http://mojavelinux.com
> >> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> >> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> seam-dev mailing list
> >> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> >>      
> >    
> 
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. 
http://mail.yahoo.com