[seam-dev] Seam 2.1.2 release

Pete Muir pmuir at redhat.com
Wed Jun 10 08:28:31 EDT 2009


So apparently, I misremembered the outcome of this discussion (which  
was that not having a GA qualifier breaks all sorts of stuff), and we  
should go back to numbering them with the GA qualifier.

Max, will it break your stuff with this no-qualifier release in there?  
Do we have to redo the release?

On 10 Jun 2009, at 11:48, Pete Muir wrote:

> Right, but they don't reflect that we were asked to drop the GA  
> qualifier. So, should we add it back in?
>
> On 9 Jun 2009, at 23:17, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>
>> The versioning guidelines is osgi afaik.
>>
>> /max
>>
>> Pete Muir wrote:
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> If someone would update the JBossVersioningGuideline wiki page,  
>>> we'll be sure to follow it!
>>>
>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 16:38, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> osgi standard is the one that actually is consistent.
>>>>
>>>> Maven 3 will be using osgi.
>>>>
>>>> Really don't think we were told to remove GA from the technical  
>>>> names.
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>> Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>> Well to be maven compatible we should switch to -CRX, -BETAX etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, I think it was OSGi, not maven that has the problem  
>>>>> you describe. Anyway, we always use explicit versions (and  
>>>>> recommend this to people using our poms) so it should be ok...
>>>>>
>>>>> Do people think we should just switch to the maven standard?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 15:12, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought this renaming did not apply for maven bundles as the  
>>>>>> maven resolution mechanism was retarded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On  Jun 9, 2009, at 08:43, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, JBoss has changed their versioning guidelines, and no  
>>>>>>> longer applies .GA to final releases...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Going forward, there will be no more GA suffix (but we still  
>>>>>>> use .CRX, .BETAX etc.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 00:41, Asgeir Frimannsson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----- "Norman Richards" <orb at nostacktrace.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> It's out.  I'm still waiting on IT to updated the latest/ 
>>>>>>>>> latest-2/
>>>>>>>>> latest-2.1 docs links, but otherwise the release process  
>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>> done.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There seems to have been a small glitch with the naming of  
>>>>>>>> the 2.1.2 release in maven:
>>>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/seam/jboss-seam/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would expect '2.1.2.GA' rather than '2.1.2'?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Congrats on the release!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>> asgeir
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>




More information about the seam-dev mailing list