[seam-dev] Seam 2.1.2 release

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

Pete Muir wrote:
> So apparently, I misremembered the outcome of this discussion (which 
> was that not having a GA qualifier breaks all sorts of stuff), and we 
> should go back to numbering them with the GA qualifier.
>
> Max, will it break your stuff with this no-qualifier release in there? 
> Do we have to redo the release?
I dont have it downloaded yet, but just try and add it as a runtime in 
JBossTools if you can do that it works...if not something gotta change ;)

But more importantly, maven repo needs it doesn't it ?


-max

>
> On 10 Jun 2009, at 11:48, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>> Right, but they don't reflect that we were asked to drop the GA 
>> qualifier. So, should we add it back in?
>>
>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 23:17, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> The versioning guidelines is osgi afaik.
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> Pete Muir wrote:
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> If someone would update the JBossVersioningGuideline wiki page, 
>>>> we'll be sure to follow it!
>>>>
>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 16:38, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> osgi standard is the one that actually is consistent.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maven 3 will be using osgi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Really don't think we were told to remove GA from the technical 
>>>>> names.
>>>>>
>>>>> /max
>>>>>
>>>>> Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>> Well to be maven compatible we should switch to -CRX, -BETAX etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, I think it was OSGi, not maven that has the problem you 
>>>>>> describe. Anyway, we always use explicit versions (and recommend 
>>>>>> this to people using our poms) so it should be ok...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do people think we should just switch to the maven standard?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 15:12, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thought this renaming did not apply for maven bundles as the 
>>>>>>> maven resolution mechanism was retarded.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On  Jun 9, 2009, at 08:43, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope, JBoss has changed their versioning guidelines, and no 
>>>>>>>> longer applies .GA to final releases...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Going forward, there will be no more GA suffix (but we still 
>>>>>>>> use .CRX, .BETAX etc.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 00:41, Asgeir Frimannsson wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----- "Norman Richards" <orb at nostacktrace.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> It's out.  I'm still waiting on IT to updated the 
>>>>>>>>>> latest/latest-2/
>>>>>>>>>> latest-2.1 docs links, but otherwise the release process 
>>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>>> done. 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There seems to have been a small glitch with the naming of the 
>>>>>>>>> 2.1.2 release in maven:
>>>>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/seam/jboss-seam/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would expect '2.1.2.GA' rather than '2.1.2'?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Congrats on the release!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>>> asgeir
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev