[seam-dev] Seam 2.1.2 release

[Max Rydahl Andersen]

> Assuming version ranges aren't used, then it's fine.
version ranges are very useful and i bet some is using it with seam...so 
I would say that it should be fixed.

/max
>
>> -max
>>
>>> On 10 Jun 2009, at 11:48, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>
>>>> Right, but they don't reflect that we were asked to drop the GA 
>>>> qualifier. So, should we add it back in?
>>>>
>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 23:17, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The versioning guidelines is osgi afaik.
>>>>>
>>>>> /max
>>>>>
>>>>> Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If someone would update the JBossVersioningGuideline wiki page, 
>>>>>> we'll be sure to follow it!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 16:38, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> osgi standard is the one that actually is consistent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maven 3 will be using osgi.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really don't think we were told to remove GA from the technical 
>>>>>>> names.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>>>> Well to be maven compatible we should switch to -CRX, -BETAX etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, I think it was OSGi, not maven that has the problem 
>>>>>>>> you describe. Anyway, we always use explicit versions (and 
>>>>>>>> recommend this to people using our poms) so it should be ok...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do people think we should just switch to the maven standard?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 15:12, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I thought this renaming did not apply for maven bundles as the 
>>>>>>>>> maven resolution mechanism was retarded.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On  Jun 9, 2009, at 08:43, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nope, JBoss has changed their versioning guidelines, and no 
>>>>>>>>>> longer applies .GA to final releases...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Going forward, there will be no more GA suffix (but we still 
>>>>>>>>>> use .CRX, .BETAX etc.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 00:41, Asgeir Frimannsson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- "Norman Richards" <orb at nostacktrace.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's out.  I'm still waiting on IT to updated the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> latest/latest-2/
>>>>>>>>>>>> latest-2.1 docs links, but otherwise the release process 
>>>>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>>>>> done. 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There seems to have been a small glitch with the naming of 
>>>>>>>>>>> the 2.1.2 release in maven:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/seam/jboss-seam/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I would expect '2.1.2.GA' rather than '2.1.2'?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Congrats on the release!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> asgeir
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev