[seam-dev] Seam 2.1.2 release

[Pete Muir]

On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:43, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:

>
>
> Pete Muir wrote:
>> So apparently, I misremembered the outcome of this discussion  
>> (which was that not having a GA qualifier breaks all sorts of  
>> stuff), and we should go back to numbering them with the GA  
>> qualifier.
>>
>> Max, will it break your stuff with this no-qualifier release in  
>> there? Do we have to redo the release?
> I dont have it downloaded yet, but just try and add it as a runtime  
> in JBossTools if you can do that it works...if not something gotta  
> change ;)

That works :-)

>
> But more importantly, maven repo needs it doesn't it ?

Assuming version ranges aren't used, then it's fine.

>
>
> -max
>
>>
>> On 10 Jun 2009, at 11:48, Pete Muir wrote:
>>
>>> Right, but they don't reflect that we were asked to drop the GA  
>>> qualifier. So, should we add it back in?
>>>
>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 23:17, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> The versioning guidelines is osgi afaik.
>>>>
>>>> /max
>>>>
>>>> Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>> :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone would update the JBossVersioningGuideline wiki page,  
>>>>> we'll be sure to follow it!
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 16:38, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> osgi standard is the one that actually is consistent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maven 3 will be using osgi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really don't think we were told to remove GA from the technical  
>>>>>> names.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /max
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>>> Well to be maven compatible we should switch to -CRX, -BETAX  
>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, I think it was OSGi, not maven that has the problem  
>>>>>>> you describe. Anyway, we always use explicit versions (and  
>>>>>>> recommend this to people using our poms) so it should be ok...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do people think we should just switch to the maven standard?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 15:12, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I thought this renaming did not apply for maven bundles as  
>>>>>>>> the maven resolution mechanism was retarded.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On  Jun 9, 2009, at 08:43, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nope, JBoss has changed their versioning guidelines, and no  
>>>>>>>>> longer applies .GA to final releases...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Going forward, there will be no more GA suffix (but we still  
>>>>>>>>> use .CRX, .BETAX etc.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 00:41, Asgeir Frimannsson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ----- "Norman Richards" <orb at nostacktrace.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> It's out.  I'm still waiting on IT to updated the latest/ 
>>>>>>>>>>> latest-2/
>>>>>>>>>>> latest-2.1 docs links, but otherwise the release process  
>>>>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>>>>> done.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There seems to have been a small glitch with the naming of  
>>>>>>>>>> the 2.1.2 release in maven:
>>>>>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/seam/jboss-seam/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would expect '2.1.2.GA' rather than '2.1.2'?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Congrats on the release!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> asgeir
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev