[seam-dev] Interceptor packaging convention

[Dan Allen]

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

> Agreed, the interceptor is definitely part of the public API - they have to
> reference the class in their beans.xml.
>

Yep, and beans.xml must be considered "their code" (as a counter to Shane's
point).


>
> Having it in the javadoc is no replacement for a decent ref guide, but can
> be useful for some IMO.
>
>
Should we have Maven build merge JavaDoc for interceptors and decorators
into the JavaDoc for the api/ module? This should be possible based on name
filtering (i.e., *Interceptor, *Decorator). It will require some build
trickery, though.

-Dan

-- 
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20100422/01d3de7d/attachment-0001.html