[seam-dev] Interceptor packaging convention

[Pete Muir]

On 23 Apr 2010, at 03:21, Dan Allen wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> Agreed, the interceptor is definitely part of the public API - they have to reference the class in their beans.xml.
> 
> Yep, and beans.xml must be considered "their code" (as a counter to Shane's point).
>  
> 
> Having it in the javadoc is no replacement for a decent ref guide, but can be useful for some IMO.
> 
>  
> Should we have Maven build merge JavaDoc for interceptors and decorators into the JavaDoc for the api/ module? This should be possible based on name filtering (i.e., *Interceptor, *Decorator).

Or presence of @Interceptor, @Decorator.

> It will require some build trickery, though.

Yes. But if we do it once in the parent, should be ok.