[seam-dev] Module reviews

[Stuart Douglas]

Currently it is:

"java.lang",
"java.util",
"javax.annotation",
"javax.inject",
"javax.enterprise.inject",
"javax.enterprise.context",
"javax.enterprise.event",
"javax.decorator",
"javax.interceptor",

Should the root namespace for seam-xml be changed to http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee? I did not use this originally for portability reasons, as other CDI implementations might not  like having 'foreign' elements in this namespace in beans.xml.

Stuart
 

On 14/06/2010, at 4:43 PM, Gavin King wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Stuart Douglas
> <stuart at baileyroberts.com.au> wrote:
> 
>>> ---------
>>> Seam XML
>>> ---------
>>> 
>>> * CDI annotations need to come from the CDI namespace, not the Seam namespace. For example:
>>> 
>>>   <s:Qualifier /> or <s:Specializes /> -> <cdi:Qualifier /> or <cdi:Specializes />
>> 
>> What namespace is <cdi: bound to? http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee?
>> 
>> If so should I dump the seam namespace entirely, or just move the annotations into a different namespace?
> 
> 
> Things that are annotations or types from the CDI/EE packages
> javax.enterprise.inject, javax.inject, etc, should all live in the
> default namespace. Not quite sure what it should be called, but the
> spec used to say:
> 
> The Java EE namespace urn:java:ee represents the following packages:
> 
> • java.lang
> • java.util
> • javax.annotation
> • javax.enterprise.inject
> • javax.enterprise.context
> • javax.interceptor
> • javax.decorator
> • javax.enterprise.event
> • javax.ejb
> • javax.persistence
> • javax.xml.ws
> • javax.jms
> • javax.sql
> 
> Now, for what we're doing, that list is probably a bit long and could
> be trimmed.
> 
> -- 
> Gavin King
> gavin.king at gmail.com
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
> http://hibernate.org
> http://seamframework.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20100614/2b538bd6/attachment.html