[seam-dev] Looking up beans for Producers in AfterBeanDiscovery
Stuart Douglas
stuart.w.douglas at gmail.com
Sat Feb 12 21:18:33 EST 2011
The spec does not actually guarantee that the beans will be available in the AfterBeanDiscovery event.
As it is possible to add beans/interceptors/decorators in this event CDI is not fully initialised yet, so even if this does sort of work some times it is certainly not portable. Have you considered using a ComputingHashMap to create the map in a lazy manner?
Stuart
On 13/02/2011, at 6:44 AM, Jordan Ganoff wrote:
> All,
>
> I've run into an issue that I haven't been able to resolve. I am collecting producers during ProcessProducer and I'd like to be able to invoke them during AfterBeanDiscovery to operate on the produces objects. When I run the application with Arquillian the beans can be looked up successfully. When the application runs as a web app they are not.
>
> The sample app is producer-test on this branch of seam-jms: https://github.com/jganoff/jms/tree/producer-test/producer-test
>
> The relevant code is here: https://github.com/jganoff/jms/blob/producer-test/producer-test/src/main/java/org/jboss/seam/jms/producertest/TestExtension.java
>
> Anyone have any ideas?
>
> Follow up question: Is this a decent way for users to configure JMS routing information (send CDI event X to JMS destination Y, etc)? The original idea was to allow users to annotate methods with @RoutingConfig and what they returned would be registered as a route. The producer idea seemed like a better fit though.
>
> --
> Jordan Ganoff
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/seam-dev/attachments/20110213/f5822f67/attachment.html
More information about the seam-dev
mailing list