[seam-dev] Weld maintenance release

[Pete Muir]

The behavior you are seeing in Weld is correct per the spec. The docs aren't are canonical source of anything, *always* check the spec ;-)

On 25 Feb 2011, at 04:24, John D. Ament wrote:

> Brian,
> 
> I identified a potential issue tonight in Weld that will be a pretty big blocker for Seam JMS to make it out anytime soon.  A maintenance release of Weld would definitely help in this one as well.  WELD-860 is the issue if you're interested.
> 
> John
> 
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Brian Leathem <bleathem at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/19/2011 07:37 AM, Clint Popetz wrote:
> > Any way we can get a Weld 1.1.1 to have 3.0 rely upon?
> >
> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-833 has been fixed in
> > 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT, and without it seam-wicket it not usuable.
> >
> > -Clint
> 
> I'm in a similar boat with Faces, in terms of needing a Weld maintenance
> release.  I became increasingly worried when I heard that Weld 1.2 might
> come with SPI changes (although I've been told this is not yet set in
> stone).
> 
> I'm going to put togehter a post to the weld-dev list outlining the
> benefit a Weld 1.1.1 release would have for Faces.  I'll include you're
> Wicket/Weld issue above as an example of another Seam module that would
> benefit from such a release, please let me know of any other issues that
> would strengthen the argument.
> 
> Are there any other modules out there that have specific issues
> requiring a Weld maintenance release?  If so, please let me know, and
> I'll put together a complete picture of how Seam could benefit from a
> 1.1.1 release.
> 
> Brian Leathem
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev