[seam-dev] Seam 3 Beta this week!

Pete Muir pmuir at bleepbleep.org.uk
Wed Jan 19 08:28:00 EST 2011


I assume this reuse extends to the tools built for JBoss logging to do built time generation of logging impl?

On 19 Jan 2011, at 13:16, Ken Finnigan wrote:

> For some context on the reasons for bringing jboss-logging into solder, please take a look at http://seamframework.org/Seam3/JBossLoggingIntegration for full details.
> 
> In a nutshell it's to enable us to remove the dependency on jboss-logging, while enabling us some flexibility in terms of creating our own annotations, that don't clash with jboss-logging and cause confusion.  The reason being that the annotations within jboss-logging were never intended for developer consumption, they are intended for use within the JBoss AS container.  For this reason the port into solder removes those annotations from jboss-logging, and moves them to a solder package where appropriate.
> 
> Feel free to amend the wiki page if there are other items that you feel are of merit.
> 
> Thanks
> Ken
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ken Finnigan <ken at kenfinnigan.me> wrote:
> Here's the link to the incorporation of jboss-logging into solder: https://github.com/kenfinnigan/solder/tree/jboss-logging
> 
> Appreciate any comments/feedback as still new at this.
> 
> If it's easier for it to be a pull request just let me know.
> 
> There will undoubtedly be a few additions to this once I work out how i18n module will look at the best location for some of these changes, solder or i18n.
> 
> Thanks
> Ken
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:
> As a team we need to review Ken's improvements and provide feedback because it's a critical piece of Seam, not to mention it's importance to the i18n API.
> 
> Ken, it would be best to post the branch where the changes live (sorry if I'm a step behind if you already have).
> 
> - Dan Allen
> 
> Sent from my Android-powered phone:
> An open platform for carriers, consumers and developers
> 
> On Jan 18, 2011 3:30 PM, "Ken Finnigan" <ken at kenfinnigan.me> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 18:49, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp at gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> I need a Solder release (I'm working on switching to beans.xml), then
> >>> I can release the alpha, and a beta quickly for Catch, or we could
> >>> still keep it at alpha. Though because it's such an integrated piece
> >>> ideally it should be beta.
> >>>
> >>> I think we should all be using the next release of solder if we can
> >>> make sure it works on Glassfish 3.0.1. I'll send a follow-up email
> >>> with my latest exception.
> >>>
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Also, please use seam-parent 7 and seam-bom 3.0.0.b06...but stay tuned, I
> >> may update to seam-parent 8 to pull in the Weld 1.1.0.Final.
> >>
> >> -Dan
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dan Allen
> >> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
> >> Registered Linux User #231597
> >>
> >> http://mojavelinux.com
> >> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> >> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> seam-dev mailing list
> >> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> >>
> >>
> > +1 to Solder release, especially after some logging/i18n changes have been
> > incorporated from some work I've done with Dan.
> > 
> > In terms of i18n, there are a couple of things I would like to get done for
> > the first Beta, as it will likely change the API, that rely on the Solder
> > changes. Not sure whether I will be able to get them all complete by
> > Wed/Thu, though will see how I go tonight.
> > 
> > Ken
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev




More information about the seam-dev mailing list