[security-dev] PicketLink restructure

[Shane Bryzak]

There was a little bit of confusion over the legacy IDM code (I had 
forgotten that it had been migrated to the picketlink-idm repo on GitHub 
albeit under different branches) but this has been sorted out now, and I 
believe all the history for it is intact.  As for the temporary IDM 
implementation we have the final snapshot of it, however since then I've 
blown it away anyhow and started working on the proper implementation.  
I don't think we need the history for the temporary stuff.

Agreed with the collective PL release.  As for the version number, did 
we ever do a 2.x release?  If so, then I agree we should update it to 
3.x for the new project.

Shane

On 04/10/12 01:06, Anil Saldhana wrote:
> Shane,
>   ahh.  You could not wait a day or two. :)  I am wondering if we 
> could have retained history via some form of "git mv".
>
> We should probably have PicketLink version as 3.0 for all the code and 
> rather than do individual releases, we can do a collective PL3.x release.
>
> Cheers.
>
> On 10/02/2012 04:56 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz wrote:
>> I restored our branches and synced with Shane on IM.
>>
>> picketlink-idm/master will be nuked and only contain some README 
>> pointing to new locations
>>
>> Current picketlink-idm repo will be kept for few more months at least 
>> and after we are in more calm situation with GateIn/EPP it will be 
>> renamed into picketlink-idm-legacy.
>>
>> Things under control :)
>>
>> Bolek
>>
>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow at redhat.com 
>> <mailto:bdawidow at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> I must say I'm quite pissed off... even yesterday I shared a link to 
>>> one of configuration files in 1.4 branch with a consultants. We 
>>> released twice last month... how could have it happened without any 
>>> question?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz 
>>> <bdawidow at redhat.com <mailto:bdawidow at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Have you just removed picketlink-idm on github?
>>>>
>>>> We are actively working on 1.4 branch and this is critical for EPP. 
>>>> Other branches are still maintenance for older versions of 
>>>> GateIn/EPP. I think I was fairly clear that we need those.
>>>>
>>>> This repo needs to be restored ASAP.
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com 
>>>> <mailto:sbryzak at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In the interests of presenting a clear message to our developers, 
>>>>> one of the steps we'll be taking is to consolidate the various 
>>>>> PicketLink projects into a single project and presenting this as 
>>>>> the "go to" solution for application security.  For now I've 
>>>>> merged the CDI and IDM subprojects (these are now submodules of 
>>>>> the PicketLink project, with "CDI" renamed to "Core") and the plan 
>>>>> is to eventually merge the social and federation modules also.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can find the new GitHub repository here: 
>>>>> https://github.com/picketlink (renamed from picketlink-cdi) and 
>>>>> the picketlink-idm repository has now been deleted.  For anyone 
>>>>> working on these modules, please use the new repository from now on.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Shane
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20121004/753d8eec/attachment.html