[security-dev] PicketLink restructure

[Anil Saldhana]

Shane,
   did you throw away the JPA code that Pedro had done for almost a 
month? Where is that code?

Code contributions have legal ramifications. We cannot just throw away 
code and loss of history is deeply disturbing.

Regards,
Anil

On 10/03/2012 05:39 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
> There was a little bit of confusion over the legacy IDM code (I had 
> forgotten that it had been migrated to the picketlink-idm repo on 
> GitHub albeit under different branches) but this has been sorted out 
> now, and I believe all the history for it is intact.  As for the 
> temporary IDM implementation we have the final snapshot of it, however 
> since then I've blown it away anyhow and started working on the proper 
> implementation.  I don't think we need the history for the temporary 
> stuff.
>
> Agreed with the collective PL release.  As for the version number, did 
> we ever do a 2.x release?  If so, then I agree we should update it to 
> 3.x for the new project.
>
> Shane
>
> On 04/10/12 01:06, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>> Shane,
>>   ahh.  You could not wait a day or two. :)  I am wondering if we 
>> could have retained history via some form of "git mv".
>>
>> We should probably have PicketLink version as 3.0 for all the code 
>> and rather than do individual releases, we can do a collective PL3.x 
>> release.
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>> On 10/02/2012 04:56 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz wrote:
>>> I restored our branches and synced with Shane on IM.
>>>
>>> picketlink-idm/master will be nuked and only contain some README 
>>> pointing to new locations
>>>
>>> Current picketlink-idm repo will be kept for few more months at 
>>> least and after we are in more calm situation with GateIn/EPP it 
>>> will be renamed into picketlink-idm-legacy.
>>>
>>> Things under control :)
>>>
>>> Bolek
>>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz 
>>> <bdawidow at redhat.com <mailto:bdawidow at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I must say I'm quite pissed off... even yesterday I shared a link 
>>>> to one of configuration files in 1.4 branch with a consultants. We 
>>>> released twice last month... how could have it happened without any 
>>>> question?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz 
>>>> <bdawidow at redhat.com <mailto:bdawidow at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Have you just removed picketlink-idm on github?
>>>>>
>>>>> We are actively working on 1.4 branch and this is critical for 
>>>>> EPP. Other branches are still maintenance for older versions of 
>>>>> GateIn/EPP. I think I was fairly clear that we need those.
>>>>>
>>>>> This repo needs to be restored ASAP.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com 
>>>>> <mailto:sbryzak at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In the interests of presenting a clear message to our developers, 
>>>>>> one of the steps we'll be taking is to consolidate the various 
>>>>>> PicketLink projects into a single project and presenting this as 
>>>>>> the "go to" solution for application security.  For now I've 
>>>>>> merged the CDI and IDM subprojects (these are now submodules of 
>>>>>> the PicketLink project, with "CDI" renamed to "Core") and the 
>>>>>> plan is to eventually merge the social and federation modules also.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can find the new GitHub repository here: 
>>>>>> https://github.com/picketlink (renamed from picketlink-cdi) and 
>>>>>> the picketlink-idm repository has now been deleted.  For anyone 
>>>>>> working on these modules, please use the new repository from now on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Shane
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> security-dev mailing list
>> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20121003/bb82e64b/attachment-0001.html