[security-dev] PicketLink restructure

[Jason Porter]

Assuming Pedro still has his git repo somewhere (local hard drive, github
fork) it's not really gone and we can restore it, or at the very least
cherry-pick the commits.

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana at redhat.com>wrote:

>  Shane,
>   did you throw away the JPA code that Pedro had done for almost a month?
> Where is that code?
>
> Code contributions have legal ramifications. We cannot just throw away
> code and loss of history is deeply disturbing.
>
> Regards,
> Anil
>
>
> On 10/03/2012 05:39 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
>
> There was a little bit of confusion over the legacy IDM code (I had
> forgotten that it had been migrated to the picketlink-idm repo on GitHub
> albeit under different branches) but this has been sorted out now, and I
> believe all the history for it is intact.  As for the temporary IDM
> implementation we have the final snapshot of it, however since then I've
> blown it away anyhow and started working on the proper implementation.  I
> don't think we need the history for the temporary stuff.
>
> Agreed with the collective PL release.  As for the version number, did we
> ever do a 2.x release?  If so, then I agree we should update it to 3.x for
> the new project.
>
> Shane
>
> On 04/10/12 01:06, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>
> Shane,
>   ahh.  You could not wait a day or two. :)  I am wondering if we could
> have retained history via some form of "git mv".
>
> We should probably have PicketLink version as 3.0 for all the code and
> rather than do individual releases, we can do a collective PL3.x release.
>
> Cheers.
>
> On 10/02/2012 04:56 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz wrote:
>
> I restored our branches and synced with Shane on IM.
>
>  picketlink-idm/master will be nuked and only contain some README
> pointing to new locations
>
>  Current picketlink-idm repo will be kept for few more months at least
> and after we are in more calm situation with GateIn/EPP it will be renamed
> into picketlink-idm-legacy.
>
>  Things under control :)
>
>  Bolek
>
>  On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>  I must say I'm quite pissed off… even yesterday I shared a link to one
> of configuration files in 1.4 branch with a consultants. We released twice
> last month… how could have it happened without any question?
>
>
>  On Oct 2, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Have you just removed picketlink-idm on github?
>
>  We are actively working on 1.4 branch and this is critical for EPP.
> Other branches are still maintenance for older versions of GateIn/EPP. I
> think I was fairly clear that we need those.
>
>  This repo needs to be restored ASAP.
>
>  On Oct 2, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>  In the interests of presenting a clear message to our developers, one of
> the steps we'll be taking is to consolidate the various PicketLink projects
> into a single project and presenting this as the "go to" solution for
> application security.  For now I've merged the CDI and IDM subprojects
> (these are now submodules of the PicketLink project, with "CDI" renamed to
> "Core") and the plan is to eventually merge the social and federation
> modules also.
>
> You can find the new GitHub repository here: https://github.com/picketlink(renamed from picketlink-cdi) and the picketlink-idm repository has now
> been deleted.  For anyone working on these modules, please use the new
> repository from now on.
>
> Thanks!
> Shane
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing listsecurity-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing listsecurity-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>
>


-- 
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp

Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling

PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20121003/aa3f8724/attachment.html