[security-dev] [PicketLink] - Module Organization

[Pedro Igor Silva]

Nice.

Thanks.
Pedro Igor

----- Original Message -----
From: "David M. Lloyd" <david.lloyd at redhat.com>
To: security-dev at lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 1:56:44 PM
Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink] - Module Organization

Always, always, always have one module per JAR.  If this doesn't make 
sense for a project (e.g. split package problems) then this indicates 
that the project's JAR boundaries were not properly considered.

On 04/03/2013 11:17 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>     I was thinking about the best way to organize the PicketLink libraries with the AS module structure.
>
>     Now that PicketLink have some sub-projects, I was wondering if we should have a single module for all libraries (core, idm, federation, oauth, etc):
>
>             org/picketlink/main
>                   - core.jar
>                   - idm.jar
>                   - federation.jar
>                   - etc.
>
>     Or if is better to have different modules for each project:
>
>             org/picketlink/core/main
>                   - core.jar
>
>             org/picketlink/idm/main
>                   - idm.jar
>
>             org/picketlink/federation/main
>                   - federation.jar
>
>     Any thoughts ?
>
> Regards.
> Pedro Igor
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>


-- 
- DML
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev