[security-dev] JPA?

[Bill Burke]

Well, I'll just STFU now.

On 6/11/2013 7:48 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
> Anil already responded to this in his very first reply:
>
> On 12/06/13 06:39, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>
>> But for Wildfly core authentication using PicketLink
>> IDM, for database backends, JDBC makes sense.
>
> I agree with him (and Jason), it absolutely does make sense to use JDBC
> for the PicketLink subsystem in Wildfly.
>
>
> On 12/06/13 09:32, Bill Burke wrote:
>> It wasn't a tangent discussion, Jason asked, "do we have to depend on
>> JPA?"  You guys inferred that to do this application model sharing
>> you're talking about, JPA is required...
>>
>> On 6/11/2013 7:24 PM, Shane Bryzak wrote:
>>> On 12/06/13 09:15, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>> I thought what we were discussing here is removing the dependency on JPA
>>>> for the RDBMS backend plugin when deploying picketlink to Wildfly?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That's how the thread started, but then it veered into a discussion
>>> about what application developers care about.
>>>
>>> On 06/11/2013 03:53 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>
>>>> JPA vs. JDBC isn't a choice, users won't care.  Why would app developers
>>>> care either?  They should be using management interfaces or the upcoming
>>>> sso server to manage their domains.
>>>     From your perspective, this might be sufficient to meet your own
>>> requirements however Anil and the security team have to look at the
>>> bigger picture.  Not every developer is going to use PicketLink in the
>>> exact same way.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> security-dev mailing list
>>> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com