[security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft

[Pedro Igor Silva]

Good suggestions. Regarding the release, going to talk with Anil and see what he is planning.

Thanks.
Pedro Igor

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com>
Cc: security-dev at lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 9:42:31 AM
Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft

The installer looks good. Two minor suggestions:

* Instead of "config/lib" have "modules/system/layers/base/org/picketlink" - to easier allow updating the modules manually without the installer (e.g. "unzip -o -d $JBOSS_HOME picketlink-inst.zip modules")
* Make it possible to specify "jboss.as.dist.dir" as a system property - to allow automated updates

Are you planning a beta release of the subsystem soon?

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> Cc: security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 2 May, 2013 11:15:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> > To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com>
> > Cc: security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 6:32:21 AM
> > Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
> > 
> > Looks good.
> > 
> > One thing that's missing is how to use the identity manager configured in
> > the
> > domain model with PicketLink Core. Has this issue been resolved yet?
> > 
> 
> I'm going to add the usage of the PicketLink Core to the docs.
> 
> > Also, it would be good if there was a zip containing all the modules
> > available in Maven and also included in the download of PicketLink. This
> > would make it simpler to install the sub-system until it's available in
> > WildFly, and after that it would make it easy to upgrade the version if
> > users wants to experiment with new features.
> > 
> 
> +1, for that. We already have something similiar with PicketLink v2 [1].
> Maybe we can use the same solution ? What do you think ?
> 
> References:
>     [1]
>     https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/Installation#Installation-PicketLinkInstaller
> 
> > Cheers,
> > Stian
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com>
> > > To: security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > Sent: Monday, 29 April, 2013 6:53:16 PM
> > > Subject: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
> > > 
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > >     Would like to share the documentation for the PicketLink Subsystem
> > >     with
> > >     some information about what was done so far.
> > > 
> > >         https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/PicketLink+Subsystem
> > > 
> > >     For now, we're only covering the IDM configuration. But we want to
> > >     provide some info about the PicketLink Core and Federation usage.
> > >     Actually, for Federation we already have some documentation (need to
> > >     review):
> > > 
> > >         https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/PicketLink+AS7+Subsystem
> > >         https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/Management+Console
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > Pedro Igor
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > security-dev mailing list
> > > security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
> > > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>