[security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft

[Anil Saldhana]

Pedro/Stian,
   it should be fine to release beta of the subsystem.

Regards,
Anil

On 05/02/2013 08:22 AM, Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> Good suggestions. Regarding the release, going to talk with Anil and see what he is planning.
>
> Thanks.
> Pedro Igor
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com>
> Cc: security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 9:42:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
>
> The installer looks good. Two minor suggestions:
>
> * Instead of "config/lib" have "modules/system/layers/base/org/picketlink" - to easier allow updating the modules manually without the installer (e.g. "unzip -o -d $JBOSS_HOME picketlink-inst.zip modules")
> * Make it possible to specify "jboss.as.dist.dir" as a system property - to allow automated updates
>
> Are you planning a beta release of the subsystem soon?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com>
>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
>> Cc: security-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 2 May, 2013 11:15:37 AM
>> Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
>>> To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com>
>>> Cc: security-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 6:32:21 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
>>>
>>> Looks good.
>>>
>>> One thing that's missing is how to use the identity manager configured in
>>> the
>>> domain model with PicketLink Core. Has this issue been resolved yet?
>>>
>> I'm going to add the usage of the PicketLink Core to the docs.
>>
>>> Also, it would be good if there was a zip containing all the modules
>>> available in Maven and also included in the download of PicketLink. This
>>> would make it simpler to install the sub-system until it's available in
>>> WildFly, and after that it would make it easy to upgrade the version if
>>> users wants to experiment with new features.
>>>
>> +1, for that. We already have something similiar with PicketLink v2 [1].
>> Maybe we can use the same solution ? What do you think ?
>>
>> References:
>>      [1]
>>      https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/Installation#Installation-PicketLinkInstaller
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Stian
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com>
>>>> To: security-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, 29 April, 2013 6:53:16 PM
>>>> Subject: [security-dev] [PicketLink Subsystem] - Documentation Draft
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>>      Would like to share the documentation for the PicketLink Subsystem
>>>>      with
>>>>      some information about what was done so far.
>>>>
>>>>          https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/PicketLink+Subsystem
>>>>
>>>>      For now, we're only covering the IDM configuration. But we want to
>>>>      provide some info about the PicketLink Core and Federation usage.
>>>>      Actually, for Federation we already have some documentation (need to
>>>>      review):
>>>>
>>>>          https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/PicketLink+AS7+Subsystem
>>>>          https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/PLINK/Management+Console
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> Pedro Igor