[security-dev] PicketLink Integration Github organization

[Anil Saldhana]

Assuming we will have integration code for multiple oss projects, I feel 
having a separate
organization makes sense.

This is just host the source code.

The website (will be revamped soon) will definitely have proper 
information as to where to seek the source code. :)

On 05/15/2013 03:12 AM, Bolesław Dawidowicz wrote:
> To be honest I find it confusing. We all know that people have hard time
> understanding what picketlink is because it contains many components.
> Having 3 github organizations won't help.
>
> We could have renamed picketlink-idm to picketlink-idm-legacy to make it
> clear it is under maintanance or something like this. Similar for other
> components. Keep -legacy versions of repos for what is still used and
> maintained and move abandoned stuff to the separate organization.
>
> https://github.com/jbossas has 20 repos. We are not that bad :)
>
> I know it is hard to put things into order in current state but IMO
> changing version from 3.x to 2.5.x and reshuffling stuff between 3
> organizations will make it quite hard to digest for people outside. Time
> to time I'm even lost myself what is where and why...
>
> On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>      footprint of PicketLink is pretty huge considering the components it
>> has - idm,core,saml,social,scim etc. Currently PicketLink components are
>> housed in the GitHub PicketLink organization
>> (https://github.com/picketlink).  The PL2 workspaces have been moved to
>> a separate organization called picketlink2 (https://github.com/picketlink2).
>>
>> We will need to host integration code for at least the following projects:
>> a) Camel
>> b) Undertow
>> c) Infinispan
>>
>> Since the integration workspaces is only going to grow over time, I
>> would like to propose a separate github organization called
>> picketlinkintegration.
>>
>> This is just an attempt to de-clutter and separate concerns.
>>
>> Wdyt?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Anil