[security-dev] PicketLink Integration Github organization
bruno at abstractj.org
Tue May 21 06:01:04 EDT 2013
Really really confusing. Where the latest changes from the new code
basis will be merged? Picketlink2? picketlinkintegration? Why not just
make use git?
Anil Saldhana wrote:
> Assuming we will have integration code for multiple oss projects, I feel
> having a separate
> organization makes sense.
> This is just host the source code.
> The website (will be revamped soon) will definitely have proper
> information as to where to seek the source code. :)
> On 05/15/2013 03:12 AM, Bolesław Dawidowicz wrote:
>> To be honest I find it confusing. We all know that people have hard time
>> understanding what picketlink is because it contains many components.
>> Having 3 github organizations won't help.
>> We could have renamed picketlink-idm to picketlink-idm-legacy to make it
>> clear it is under maintanance or something like this. Similar for other
>> components. Keep -legacy versions of repos for what is still used and
>> maintained and move abandoned stuff to the separate organization.
>> https://github.com/jbossas has 20 repos. We are not that bad :)
>> I know it is hard to put things into order in current state but IMO
>> changing version from 3.x to 2.5.x and reshuffling stuff between 3
>> organizations will make it quite hard to digest for people outside. Time
>> to time I'm even lost myself what is where and why...
>> On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> footprint of PicketLink is pretty huge considering the components it
>>> has - idm,core,saml,social,scim etc. Currently PicketLink components are
>>> housed in the GitHub PicketLink organization
>>> (https://github.com/picketlink). The PL2 workspaces have been moved to
>>> a separate organization called picketlink2 (https://github.com/picketlink2).
>>> We will need to host integration code for at least the following projects:
>>> a) Camel
>>> b) Undertow
>>> c) Infinispan
>>> Since the integration workspaces is only going to grow over time, I
>>> would like to propose a separate github organization called
>>> This is just an attempt to de-clutter and separate concerns.
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
More information about the security-dev