[security-dev] PicketLink Integration Github organization

Anil Saldhana asaldhan at redhat.com
Tue May 21 09:31:26 EDT 2013

The integration projects will be too many to make the PL git organization overflow and confuse people. That is why I want to keep the integration projects away from the github/PicketLink organization.

github/PicketLink2 holds the old code base (pre 2.5)

Since we are revamping the website and streamlined documentation, hopefully the confusion will go away. :)

On May 21, 2013, at 5:01 AM, Bruno  Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> Really really confusing. Where the latest changes from the new code 
> basis will be merged? Picketlink2? picketlinkintegration? Why not just 
> make use git?
> Anil Saldhana wrote:
>> Assuming we will have integration code for multiple oss projects, I feel
>> having a separate
>> organization makes sense.
>> This is just host the source code.
>> The website (will be revamped soon) will definitely have proper
>> information as to where to seek the source code. :)
>> On 05/15/2013 03:12 AM, Bolesław Dawidowicz wrote:
>>> To be honest I find it confusing. We all know that people have hard time
>>> understanding what picketlink is because it contains many components.
>>> Having 3 github organizations won't help.
>>> We could have renamed picketlink-idm to picketlink-idm-legacy to make it
>>> clear it is under maintanance or something like this. Similar for other
>>> components. Keep -legacy versions of repos for what is still used and
>>> maintained and move abandoned stuff to the separate organization.
>>> https://github.com/jbossas has 20 repos. We are not that bad :)
>>> I know it is hard to put things into order in current state but IMO
>>> changing version from 3.x to 2.5.x and reshuffling stuff between 3
>>> organizations will make it quite hard to digest for people outside. Time
>>> to time I'm even lost myself what is where and why...
>>> On 05/14/2013 05:39 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>      footprint of PicketLink is pretty huge considering the components it
>>>> has - idm,core,saml,social,scim etc. Currently PicketLink components are
>>>> housed in the GitHub PicketLink organization
>>>> (https://github.com/picketlink).  The PL2 workspaces have been moved to
>>>> a separate organization called picketlink2 (https://github.com/picketlink2).
>>>> We will need to host integration code for at least the following projects:
>>>> a) Camel
>>>> b) Undertow
>>>> c) Infinispan
>>>> Since the integration workspaces is only going to grow over time, I
>>>> would like to propose a separate github organization called
>>>> picketlinkintegration.
>>>> This is just an attempt to de-clutter and separate concerns.
>>>> Wdyt?
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Anil
>> _______________________________________________
>> security-dev mailing list
>> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
> _______________________________________________
> security-dev mailing list
> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev

More information about the security-dev mailing list