[security-dev] Picketlink 2.8.0

Arthur Gregório arthurshakal at gmail.com
Mon Nov 23 08:54:01 EST 2015


And KC does not have the same purpose as the PL.

In short, I have no reason to migrate from one to the other, I use PL or go
back to Spring Security.

But it seems that there has not been any development in PL, at least in
recent months, in short, it seems that the project is dying and all that
were used for its own account.

And with bugs like this https://developer.jboss.org/thread/266387, it's not
cool to let the project stalled...


*Arthur P. Gregório*
*+55 45 9958-0302*
@gregorioarthur
www.arthurgregorio.eti.br

2015-11-23 11:47 GMT-02:00 Stephen Agneta <sagneta at gmail.com>:

>
> It certainly appears that everything has moved to key-cloak but I am
> unsure that keycloak is ready to take the burden of current Picketlink
> implementations. Nor am I sure how the migration process would occur. The
> abruptness of the change is a bit disconcerting. Having said that
> Picketlink is working fine save for one defect that which I requested that
> is on the git HEAD but not in any particular release.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:43 AM Arthur Gregório <arthurshakal at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Picketlink is dead?
>>
>> The last commit in the project repo was in 9 july..
>>
>> Is there a schedule for the new version or something like that?
>>
>> at.,
>>
>> *Arthur P. Gregório*
>> *+55 45 9958-0302 <%2B55%2045%209958-0302>*
>> @gregorioarthur
>> www.arthurgregorio.eti.br
>> _______________________________________________
>> security-dev mailing list
>> security-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/security-dev/attachments/20151123/135c8efe/attachment.html 


More information about the security-dev mailing list